Clarifying user intent
The user shared a headline without asking a specific question, so I think they might want a summary or more details. It’s best to clarify first. I could ask them, "需要我翻译、扩展细节、还是写一条推文/通稿?" I should offer options like summary, source check, or translation since it’s ambiguous. I’ll also mention that I don’t have live browsing capability but can help within those parameters. I want to avoid fabricating details while still providing valuable context.Proposing content options
I want to keep this concise but informative. I can turn it into a news brief, telegram-style post, social media snippets, and an optimized headline. I think asking if they want more context, like match details, is a good idea. I could provide two versions of the headline, a 30-second news script, and three social media posts. It's important to remain friendly and offer these options clearly for a quick response. No need for a planning tool since it’s straightforward!
需要我做什么？可以选一个：
- 写一条30秒快讯
- 准备社媒文案（微博/推文）
- 优化标题/副标题
- 英文翻译与简报
- 去核对来源并补充细节
先给你几个即用版：
标题优化（2选1）
- 罗体：罗马尼奥利、贡多齐赛后不满判罚；免于停赛，或遭罚款
- 罗体：拉齐奥双将吐槽裁判，预计不被停赛；纪律处分或限于罚款
30秒快讯 罗马体育媒体称，拉齐奥的罗马尼奥利与贡多齐因对裁判判罚表达不满而被关注。消息称两人不会被追罚停赛，最严可能为罚款。俱乐部层面暂无进一步申诉动态，后续以官方通报为准。
社媒文案（可直接发）
- 罗体：罗马尼奥利&贡多齐赛后对判罚不满，预计不会被停赛，或仅罚款处理。你怎么看这场执法？#Lazio
- 来自罗体的最新消息：两名拉齐奥球员表达不满引发关注，但纪律层面不涉及停赛。公平吗？
- 不满裁判但免于停赛——罗马尼奥利、贡多齐或最多罚款。是否应更严格？留言讨论。
需要我补充比赛背景、原报道链接来源核对，或改成英文版本吗？
